Win Strategy: Making Winning Choices™

A good strategy process produces distinctive, robust, actionable decisions on the most important issues

Today, industry relies on tired approaches to developing win strategies for government competitions. These approaches lead to strategies that are oftentimes not actionable because they are not based on authentic choices, or fall apart because of lack of internal consensus, or fail to be responsive to changes with customer desires or competitors’ moves. The principal weakness is the lack of context to capture the complexity and nuances of the customer, RFP requirements and the competition. Developing a successful Win Strategy is a dynamic process that drives the success or failure of the capture and proposal effort. It is not a static statement of conditions. What is needed is an analytical approach to consider a variety of choices and test those choices against what is known to be true using a formal, logical framework.

In the past decade, we’ve seen the federal market become hypercompetitive and government agencies wrestle with increasing uncertainty over requirements, funding and stakeholder alignment. These factors have resulted in a much more dynamic and challenging environment during which win strategies have to be repeatedly tested and adjusted during the course of a competition.

Today, industry relies on tired approaches to developing win strategies for government competitions. These approaches lead to strategies that are oftentimes not actionable because they are not based on authentic choices, or fall apart because of lack of internal consensus, or fail to be responsive to changes with customer desires or competitors’ moves. The principal weakness is the lack of context to capture the complexity and nuances of the customer, RFP requirements and the competition. Developing a successful Win Strategy is a dynamic process that drives the success or failure of the capture and proposal effort. It is not a static statement of conditions. What is needed is an analytical approach to consider a variety of choices and test those choices against what is known to be true using a formal, logical framework.

The methodology builds on the foundation of SMA’s traditional practice that avoids protracted decision-making while still being transparent and repeatable. Making Winning Choices™ is team-based and depends on identifying evidence that establishes a clear, explainable burden of proof for key questions. Just as important, it is adaptable to unique, albeit often changing, RFP and proposal requirements and circumstances. Furthermore, Making Winning Choices™ forces real decisions and trade-offs on the four central issues driving winning proposals:

1

The technical offering

2

The enterprise offering

3

The program approach

4

The pricing and contract terms

Making Winning Choices™ has repeatedly proven itself, resulting in win strategies that embody all of the attributes of “good” strategy decisions. They are creative, genuine, robust, actionable and, above all, compelling.

Win Strategy Solutions

Win Strategy Assessment

How confident are you that you have the right Win Strategy? Take our FREE assessment.